Our People

Thomas F.
Feeney

Managing Director

Americas | New York office

+1 212 537 5300

tfeeney@nardelloandco.com

Headshot of Thomas Feeney

Thomas is an integral member of Nardello & Co.’s Litigation & Arbitration Support, Anti-Corruption/FCPA, & Fraud Investigations practices.

Having managed and directed investigations regarding white collar crime matters, including securities fraud, employee embezzlement, commercial bribery, and mail fraud in both the public and private sectors, Tom brings a wealth of experience to the firm.  He has interviewed witnesses around the world and appeared as an expert witness in a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matter tied to the landmark Brazilian anti-corruption probe known as Operação Lava Jato.  He has managed and field-supervised numerous surveillance matters, including a month-long multi-state mobile surveillance.  Before joining Nardello & Co., he worked for an international law firm, where he led and participated in numerous investigations involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, bribery, fraud, and embezzlement.  Prior to that, he served as a US postal inspector in New York for a decade and was case agent for several notable securities fraud investigations.

For the past four years, Chambers and Partners has awarded him a Band 1 ranking, their highest level of recognition, in the Litigation Support Guide for Business Intelligence & Investigations (USA).  Clients have called him “superb on all levels,” someone “who can be trusted with the most sensitive matters,” “one of the best investigators with whom [they] have ever worked,” and “the master of surveillance.” Another source comments: “Thomas Feeney writes like a poet and performs like a warrior.”

In the six years he worked at the international law firm of Dewey & LeBoeuf, Tom led and participated in numerous investigations in support of civil litigation matters as well as matters involving bribery, fraud, embezzlement, and alleged violations of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Prior to that, he served for a decade as a US postal inspector in New York. He was case agent for the investigation and prosecution of US vs. John J. Rigas et al., in which the former CEO and former CFO of Adelphia Communications Corporation, one of the nation’s largest cable television companies, were convicted of numerous securities and bank fraud charges following a seven-month trial.

Tom also served on the Joint Terrorism Task Force in New York and was a representative to FINRA’s White Collar Crime roundtable. He has spoken on white-collar crime at the FBI’s Corporate Fraud Training Conference and has lectured at both New York University and Villanova law schools. He has prepared submissions for congressional review and also contributed to Building a World-Class Compliance Program: Best Practices and Strategies for Success, by Martin T. Biegelman (Wiley, 2008).

Representative matters

  • In defense of a civil matter arising from improprieties alleged to have occurred at a high-profile workplace, Tom located and interviewed former professional colleagues of the complainant. Traveling to five states in one month, Tom developed more than 10 witnesses and collected documentary evidence that showed how, rather than being a victim, the complainant planned, initiated, and conducted a personal relationship with a celebrity with the deliberate aim of obtaining a prominent position in the television industry. The information gathered proved crucial to the defense in obtaining an overwhelmingly favorable settlement.
  • On behalf of four bank employees charged with mortgage fraud in federal court, Tom undertook an extensive investigation in which he led teams that identified, located, and interviewed nearly every party involved in each mortgage transaction undertaken by the defendants, from the home buyers and sellers to real estate agents, appraisers, and numerous bank employees, including mortgage brokers, underwriters, and senior managers. Over a five-month period, more than 100 interviews were conducted in eight states. Several of the interviews developed significant information that suggested the bank had prioritized sales over internal controls, loosening underwriting standards to the point of meaninglessness with the aim of closing mortgages and reselling them as fast as possible to skirt liability for the poorly underwritten loans. This information undercut the prosecution’s claim that the bank maintained high underwriting standards that the defendants conspired to circumvent.
  • In the wake of a tragedy at a public event, counsel for the event sponsor retained Nardello & Co. to document the conditions at the event site; review hours of video footage taken at the event to identity relevant sequences; and preserve and interpret social media generated by those who attended the event. After documenting the conditions at the site, Tom led the team that scoured thousands of posts on nine major social media platforms to identify and forensically preserve messages posted on the day of, or the day after the event, and located eyewitness accounts, identified eyewitnesses, and created a timeline of the event. Other members of the team reviewed more than 120 hours of video footage from various sources, including professional film crews, amateur videographers, and security cameras. By the end of the engagement, he had provided counsel with, among other things, a collection of forensically preserved social media as well as an analysis of that media, which identified eyewitnesses and collated their accounts with information from news reports and from video feeds into a timeline of the event.
  • In support of a pharmaceutical supplier being sued for fraud in federal court, Tom examined the supplier’s internal records to identify the 21 customers referred to, but not named, in the complaint. Over a three-week period, he traveled to 18 states to interview all 21 alleged victims. After interviewing each customer, he drafted and secured a sworn statement outlining the true circumstances under which each person ordered and received supplies from the client. Counsel used these affidavits to buttress the client’s defense that the fraud claims were baseless.
  • Over a three-week period, Tom led a team of a dozen operatives in three states in a mobile surveillance operation in an effort to determine if a high-net-worth individual who was a potential litigation adversary of a client was meeting with parties who were adverse to the client. Despite the subject engaging in interstate travel on a nearly alternate-day schedule and occasionally traveling by private jet, Tom was able to document the daily activities of the subject and identify the parties with whom the subject met throughout this period. The information developed during surveillance proved invaluable as the findings contradicted beliefs long held by the client, allowing the client to reorganize its resources based on the apparent likelihood of litigation.

Languages spoken

  • English (Fluent)
  • Spanish (Advanced)

Education

  • BA, English & Spanish Literature, University of Virginia

Recognition & awards

  • Chambers and Partners 2021-2026 Litigation Support Guide: Band 1 (2023-2025)
  • Executive Award of the Chief Postal Inspector
  • Investigator of the Year, Federal Law Enforcement Foundation

Publications

  • Contributor: Building a World-Class Compliance Program: Best Practices and Strategies for Success, by Martin T. Biegelman (Wiley, 2008)
  • Article: Investigating the SCOTUS leak: Here's what needs to be done, with Nicholas Peck (The Hill, 2023)